Trying to Teach a Rhino to Dance

I laughed out loud this morning while reading “You Can’t Make Lawyers into Techies: 3 Lessons About LPM” from Pam Woldow, General Counsel at Edge International. She quotes the adage, “never try to teach a rhino to dance. The results are generally unsatisfactory and it annoys the rhino.”

The legal profession in general has been frustratingly slow to embrace both technology and project management in managing litigation. We don’t have that luxury in the eDiscovery world. As a lawyer whose practice is focused on managing complex electronic discovery projects, I have spent lots of time developing project plans that integrate technology and process to reduce cost and increase the quality of eDiscovery work (identification, preservation, collection, early case assessment, data processing, data filtering, document review and production).

Naturally, I also spend lots of time advocating for increased technology utilization and project management discipline. Here are a few of the dance lessons I have been teaching for several years with varying levels of success:

Embrace Technology: Technology continues to evolve in ways that affect both the types of eDiscovery problems we face and the types of solutions we deploy to solve eDiscovery problems. Many lawyers will never fully grasp the inner workings of data indexing and search or understand how document review tools work. However, understanding that these tools have value and staffing your team with folks that do understand them will give your litigation team an edge on those that insist on living in a paper only world or wait so long to address the eDiscovery aspect of their case that they are at a strategic disadvantage.

Implement Project Management Discipline: An eDiscovery project has many moving parts. This is not to say that other aspects of litigation are simple. However, the folks litigating the case have likely been through many cases and the steps have become second nature. The eDiscovery aspect of litigation is far from second nature for most litigators so project management discipline is essential: identify and involve the right people as soon as possible, develop a realistic project plan that is customized for the task and deploy technology solutions that are defensible and cost effective.

Find the Right People: Both eDiscovery and project management are complex topics that are not mastered by attending a CLE or reading a few books. Dennis Kiker posted an excellent article nearby on the difference between a lawyer that has dealt with a few eDiscovery issues in her cases and a lawyer that focuses her practice on the law, technology and process of eDiscovery. Quarterbacking the eDiscovery aspect of a case is best done by someone who has been doing so long enough to see the anomalies and to know how easily the budget or timeline can go off the rails.

We are progressing to a time where eDiscovery is just another routine part of litigation.  To get to that point, we need to understand that technology is not going away and that eDiscovery is best handled by getting the right people involved early to set up and execute a defensible plan.

This entry was posted in Document Review and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
Print This Post Print This Post

4 Responses to Trying to Teach a Rhino to Dance

  1. Pingback: Document Solutions, Inc. » Trying to Teach a Rhino to Dance

  2. avatar Jordan G. says:

    Great points Daryl. You’d be surprised (or probably not) by the number of experienced trial attorneys who don’t understand the need to build in sufficient time for production of multimillion page productions, or who need someone experienced in e-discovery work to help them plan for what tiff production of excels (for example) will do in terms of pushing forward deadlines to define production sets. Involving folks with experience with these issues can help resolve anxiety and ensure timely productions.

    • avatar Marelin says:

      Odlična kritika aenukltog ministarstva nauke i njegovih futurističkih projekata. Ali treba biti oprezan i u hvaljenju Istraživačke stanice Petnica. Činjenica je da je ovo bila sjajna ideja i poduhvat grupe omladinaca pre 30 godina. I nesporno je da je ovo bio sjajan istraživački centar sve do 1990. godine. A od tada počinje njen nagli pad, stalni nedostatak sredstava za finansiranje aktivnosti, odlazak skoro svih stručnih kadrova, snažan upliv osnivača Dušana Mihailovića, Soroša i Sonje Light. Sve to dovodi do pada popularnosti među mladima, a rukovodstvo Petnice sastavljeno od nesvršenih studenata koji su pregurali 50 godina ne uspevaju da održe raniji nesporni rejting. Formiranjem ove Vlade nekoliko bivših polaznika seminara u Petnici se odlično pozicioniraju u kabinetu Đelića i na mestu savetnika Predsednika Srbije. Tako da je ove godine iz istog zajma izdvojeno oko 7 miliona evra za takozvanu treću fazu Petnice. Radi se o megalomanskom građevinskom projektu višestruko predimenzioniranom za koga neće biti novca za održavanje. Umesto da se napravi 3-5 manjih regionalnih centara za podsticanje naučnog podmladka napraviće se ovaj centar gde nema nikakve šanse da nastavu pohađa 200 polaznika odjednom. I na ovom primeru se vidi potpuno odsustvo državne politike kada je u pitanju naučni podmladak. Ovaj megalomanski projekat guraju ministarstva iz Demokratske stranke, dok Petnicu sabotira Socijalistička partija Srbije već 20 godina, kad god je bila u prilici.

  3. avatar Daryl Shetterly says:

    Agreed. Many of the ediscovery problems law firms and corporations are facing are really failures to plan, budget and execute properly.

    Thanks for the comment, Jordan!

    Daryl

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!